In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Roeland M.J. Meyer" wri tes: > At 11:28 AM 2/16/99 +0200, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: > >On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote: > > > >> NOW we go back up a few thousand feet to the primary question, do TLD > >> charters serve a purpose? > > > >Why should they when they can not be enforced? > > That is the second part of the question. To what degree do they need to be > enforced? I submit that enforcement only needs to occur to a level where > the TLD registry can claim "due diligence". The question then becomes a > boundary problem as to when "due diligence" is satisfied. Quite so. Due Diligence is miles from Enforcement of Charter! el
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... William X. Walsh
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Antony Van Couvering
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... William X. Walsh
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Roeland M.J. Meyer
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks v... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
