In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "William X. Walsh" writes: > > On 16-Feb-99 Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote: > > >I am purely looking at the implementation. If implementation is not > > >possible, we can stop wasting time and insults on the issue. > > > > I don't think implementation is the major issue at the moment. > > Certainly it is. > > Arguments have been put out there that the entire concept is flawed. I really do not understand why we are discussing an issue that can not be implemented. No amount of horsepower (hardware/software) can make the decisions at issue here. It has to be done by human(s). That makes it economy of scale. el
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Antony Van Couvering
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Antony Van Couvering
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Dr Eberhard W Lisse
