Carl,
> I have personally seen many, many dozens of cases in which
> covetous parties brought meritless claims in NSI's "court" and in
> which NSI ruled in their favor, announcing that it had determined to
> take the domain name away from its owner.
Supposing that NSF's granting a monopoly to NSI is defensible,
wouldn't this behavior stand as abuse of the privilege? How come
nobody has taken NSI to court?
Supposing it isnt defensible, how come nobody has sued USG?
Does it really need WIPO to do this?
kerry
