On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Bill Lovell wrote:
> At 05:43 AM 2/17/99 +00-04, you wrote:
> >
> >Supposing that NSF's granting a monopoly to NSI is defensible,
> >wouldn't this behavior stand as abuse of the privilege? How come
> >nobody has taken NSI to court?
> >
> >Supposing it isnt defensible, how come nobody has sued USG?
> >Does it really need WIPO to do this?
> >
> Because no one can come up with the bucks to pay one of us
> "greedy lawyers" to do so? Hmm.
If I understand it first needs an "aggrieved party"
Hmm...
el
