At 01:26 AM 2/19/99 -0800, you wrote: >At 05:12 PM 2/17/99 -0600, you wrote: >> >> >>How could it possibly make "economic sense" to spend thousands of dollars >>defending one's right to a $35 per year domain name, particularly if said >>name is not being used for commercial purposes? > Well, the allegation has been made that on-going businesses are threatened >with extinction when NSI sends the 37-day letter, in which case it would >make sense to get together the court filing fees and about a $1000 in legal fees >to file a declaratory judgment complaint with pendant tort claims (i.e. malicious prosecution). If it is merely a $70 investment, then, no, it doesn't make economic sense, they just sell the >name to the entity to whom it is worth more. The Cato Institute would endorse such allocation of resources. > > >
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dispute hits ear... Carl Oppedahl
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dispute hits... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dispute ... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dis... Bill Lovell
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dispute ... Martin B. Schwimmer
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dis... Carl Oppedahl
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain... Martin B. Schwimmer
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain... John B. Reynolds
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain... Bill Lovell
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain... Martin B. Schwimmer
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain... Mikki Barry
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain... Carl Oppedahl
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dispute ... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dis... jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dis... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dis... Dan Steinberg
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dispute hits... Bill Lovell
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: Domain dispute hits earth Ellen Rony
