For purposes of comparison, what other technologies have been deemed illegal recently?
Or is it just the use of the technology for specific purposes?
Diane Cabell wrote:
> Milton Mueller wrote:
>
> > Kent Crispin wrote:
> > (....)
> > > are
> > > we changing the caching mechanism?
> >
> > Take a look at the recent European Parliament ruling on caching as a violation of
> > copyright.
>
> RAM caching has been deemed a copyright violation in the US since MAI Systems Corp.
> v. Peak
> Computer, Inc., 991 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1993) Whether browser caching will be
> considered fair use has not yet been litigated.
>
> Diane Cabell
> http://www.mama-tech.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fausett, Gaeta & Lund, LLP
> 21 School Street, 3rd Floor
> Boston, MA
> 1.617.227.1600 (vox)
> 1.617.227.1608 (fax)
--
Mark Measday
__________________________________________________________________________
Josmarian SA [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
UK tel/fax: 0044.181.747.9167
French tel/fax: 0033.450.20.94.92
Swiss tel/fax: 0041.22.363.88.00
L'aiuola che ci fa tanto feroci. Divina Commedia, Paradiso, XXII, 151
__________________________________________________________________________
