>the NSF and NSI say the proposed changes [ICANN] are another reason
why the >lawsuit ought to be thrown out of court.
>
>"This lawsuit represents an effort by plaintiff to derail that
carefully developed process," >attorneys for the NSF argued in a court
brief filed last year. "In essence, plaintiff >demands that the issue
of new generic TLDs should be decided not by the Internet >community,
but rather by a court order requiring the addition to the DNS of some
500 >TLDs that plaintiff has already sold to prospective registrants."
The NSF goes on to >argue that the case should be stayed until the
plan has been implemented.
This appears to be an outright lie. PGMedia's lawsuit precedes the
White Paper by a year. How can they be "derailing" a process that
didn't exist when the suit was filed?
Greg Skinner wrote:
> http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,32865,00.html?st.ne.lh..ni
