Nope. That depends on the specific content of the judge's decision. You are assuming, once again, that a pgmedia victory means that the judge simply ratifies pgmedia's specific proposed way of doing things. That is not how antitrust cases work, generally. For example, if the DOJ "wins" its case against Microsoft, it is by no means clear what the ultimate remedy will be. A fine, a divestiture, regulation? No one knows. --MM John B. Reynolds wrote: > In the event of a PGMedia victory, anyone wanting to operate .web or any of > the 515 other TLDs claimed by PGMedia would have to overturn existing > precedent. >
- [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? Milton Mueller
- RE: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? John B. Reynolds
- Re: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? Milton Mueller
- RE: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? John B. Reynolds
- Re: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? Milton Mueller
- RE: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? John B. Reynolds
- pgMedia case was:Re: [IFWP]... Milton Mueller
- pgMedia case was:Re: [IFWP]... jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? Milton Mueller
- RE: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? Name.Space
- RE: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? John B. Reynolds
- Re: [IFWP] Is NSI a monopoly? jeff Williams
