Not form my observation.
BWG was cc'd as a courtesy. Poepel simply kept the cc line.
Nothing gets decided on the BWG list. How could it? What
meaning or significance could it have.
I agree the foul stencg of secret deals from IAHC
days still lingers, but you're on a witch hunt Kent.
At 10:08 PM 1/8/99 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 12:41:33AM -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>> Isn't this going a bit too far ?
>>
>> Last night I met with Jay Fenello. Nobody was told,
>> nobody could show up unless they stumbled across us.
>> Secret. Closed. Evil.
>>
>> But this happens. Poeple do meet without wanitng the
>> whole world there.
>>
>> I figure as long as no decidions are mad and we don't
>> hear crap like "so and so and such and such met and
>> a decsion was made..." - and that decision afffects
>> the outcome of this circius, then I figure it's fair game.
>
>It's obvious, however, from the continual "cc's" to the
>"bwg-n-friends" list in Mikki's messages that things were being
>decided on the closed bwg-n-friends list as far as the ORSC draft was
>concerned. Most of Mikki's draft just appeared on the ORSC list --
>the comments from the ORSC list are only a small part of the text.
>Therefore, I think it is safe to say that the ORSC draft was
>developed through a closed process, with some window dressing
>interaction on the so-called "open" ORSC list.
>
>A clever maneuver.
>
>
>--
>Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "Do good, and you'll be
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
>
--
"To find out what your opponent is up to, look at what he
says about you" - unknown
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
