>It's obvious, however, from the continual "cc's" to the
>"bwg-n-friends" list in Mikki's messages that things were being
>decided on the closed bwg-n-friends list as far as the ORSC draft was
>concerned. Most of Mikki's draft just appeared on the ORSC list --
>the comments from the ORSC list are only a small part of the text.
>Therefore, I think it is safe to say that the ORSC draft was
>developed through a closed process, with some window dressing
>interaction on the so-called "open" ORSC list.
Uh, excuse me? Most of the commentary on the draft was from the quite open
ORSC list. If you wish to discredit the draft, Kent, you'll have to try
harder than that.
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
