Bill and all,
Bill Lovell wrote:
> At 03:00 AM 2/27/99 -0800, you wrote:
> >To my previous message,
> >
> >One particular point I might add, this puts a pretty serious dent in the
> >argument that domain names aren't owned. They are owned in the same sense
> >that trademarks are owned, especially if they are also trade marked,
> >whether in common law or registered with USPTO. It appears that domain
> >names are owned after all.
>
> Indeed, even more so. The case law says that trademarks are NOT property.
> Their purpose is to benefit the consuming public, not the trademark "owner."
Than to follow your logic here if a Domain Name is trademarked, it is
not property, yet it can be owned? Hummmmm? Interesting logic here.
>
>
> Bill Lovell
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
