Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademark Enforcement at the TLD Level. WAS Re:alternate rootzone

[Karl Auerbach]

> Indeed, even more so.  The case law says that trademarks are NOT property.
> Their purpose is to benefit the consuming public, not the trademark "owner."

I usually see that handled by the imposition of a constructive trust, not
of a declaration that something is not what it obviously is.

                --karl--