Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:

> One of the reasons that Mueller's study is not worth the storage space it
> takes up is that he presumed to categorize cases based on an incomplete
> knowledge of the facts (and law) involved.  I mean, how many final court
> decisions did he use in his study (not that final court decisions give the
> definitive facts but they do give the definitive law).

We're all still waiting for you to contest a single one of those
classifications.Is Pokey.org a string conflict as I defined it, or not? How
about zippo.com?
How many final court decisions did we use? All of them that were available.

By the way, all knowledge of "facts" is incomplete.
--MM

Reply via email to