At 05:56 PM 3/1/99 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:
>
>> One of the reasons that Mueller's study is not worth the storage space it
>> takes up is that he presumed to categorize cases based on an incomplete
>> knowledge of the facts (and law) involved.  I mean, how many final court
>> decisions did he use in his study (not that final court decisions give the
>> definitive facts but they do give the definitive law).
>
>We're all still waiting for you to contest a single one of those
>classifications.Is Pokey.org a string conflict as I defined it, or not? How
>about zippo.com?
>How many final court decisions did we use? All of them that were available.
>

How many of the people to whom you have cited the results of the study
(WIPO for example) understood that you had excluded burger.king.co.uk from
the study?  

Wnen you say that "TM Owners abuse NSI policy more than are abused by
pirates" that you have excluded the owners of neiman-marcus.com from the
list of TM owners who have been abused by pirates?

Reply via email to