Terry and all, Thank you Terry for pointing this out, I appritiate it. It should read as follows: The single biggest point of inaccuracy here is that there was NO points of consensus at the DNSO meeting and all of the previous comments which the ICANN requested prior to the Singapore meeting were conspicuously omitted, verifying that there is certainly not a consensus on either of the discussed DNSO drafts. Terry Calhoun wrote: > jeff Williams wrote: > > > > The single biggest point of inaccuracy here is that there was NO > > points of consensus at the DNSO meeting and none of the previous > > comments which the ICANN requested prior to the Singapore meeting were > > conspicuously omitted, verifying that there is certainly not a > > consensus on either of the discussed DNSO drafts. > > Jeff, I simply cannot make sense of this sentence. Could you please make > a stab at re-writing it to reflect your intent? > > -- > Terry Calhoun, MAIP, Internet Editor > Society for College and University Planning (SCUP) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.scup.org > > --- > You are subscribed to dnso.discuss as: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives go to: > http://lists.association.org/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=dnso.discuss > This list system donated by Lyris Technologies (http://www.lyris.com/). Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
