On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 07:32:11PM -0500, Milton Mueller wrote:
>
>
> Kent Crispin wrote:
>
> > What on earth makes you think that "free expression" is the opposite
> > of TM? It is perfectly consistent for a TM holder to favor "free
> > expression". I wager you $100 that 3 out of 4 TM owners favor free
> > expression.
>
>It is a well-established part of the practice of real law that there is a
>persistent tension between the right of expression recognized in the first
>amendment and the right of trademark (and copyright holders) to control the use of
>their marks or products. I'll wager you that 4 out of 4 TM lawyers will tell you
>the same thing.
So what? That doesn't mean that a "free expression" constituency is
in any meaningful sense an "opposite" to a TM constituency.
--
Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Karl Auerbach
- ICANN's DNSO decision concerns was:Re: [IFWP... jeff Williams
- [IFWP] A practical approach to defining cons... Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: [IFWP] Singapore Update Antony Van Couvering
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: [IFWP] Singapore Update Antony Van Couvering
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Dr Eberhard W Lisse
