Karl Auerbach wrote:
>For the ying of the constituency of trademark owners there is the yang of
>the constituency of those who desire to use names in those areas in which
>trademarks do not run, i.e. the legitimate areas not covered by a mark.
My personal view is that constituencies are defined by the general
interest (i.e. the implications of trademarks and other intellectual
property on the internet) not by a more narrow political position (i.e.
trademark owners should have first right on any domain name that bears
their mark). Ying and yang coexist in the same constituency.
I think this is the feeling of most who were present, and I seriously
doubt that the ICANN Board will approve a constituency that is not open
to those on all sides of a particular debate.
-- Bret
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: [IFWP] Singapore Update Antony Van Couvering
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: [IFWP] Singapore Update Antony Van Couvering
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Bret A. Fausett
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update martys
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Bret A. Fausett
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Tamar Frankel
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Singapore Update Ronda Hauben
