Michael Sondow said there were several dissents. Someone else (Gurry?)
said something (I think), and I asked about who else dissented, because I
know only about Froomkin, and I'd be interested to hear more (rather than
vague assertions). Only one dissent among WIPO's own experts, that is....
Sondow then allowed as he could think of only one. (There's a tape if this
is really important.)
Esther Dyson
At 12:40 PM 07/03/99 -0500, Milton Mueller wrote:
>In reading some condensed notes of ICANN's deliberations in Singapore, I
>noticed that Professor's Froomkin's critique of the WIPO Interim Report was
>mentioned, and someone replied that there was "only one dissent." Context
>implies that this was a Board member who so replied, but it is not clear. Can
>someone who was there please tell me
>a) who made this reply, and if possible
>b) provide a more complete description of what was said?
>
>--MM
>
>
>
>
Esther Dyson Always make new mistakes!
chairman, EDventure Holdings
interim chairman, Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & Numbers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 (212) 924-8800
1 (212) 924-0240 fax
104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
New York, NY 10011 USA
http://www.edventure.com http://www.icann.org
PC Forum: 21 to 24 March 1999, Scottsdale (Phoenix), Arizona
High-Tech Forum in Europe: 24 to 26 October 1999, Budapest
Book: "Release 2.0: A design for living in the digital age"
