Hi Esther,
Sorry for the confusion -- I guess I
didn't understand your previous comments.
Of course, one easy way to prevent these
misunderstandings would be to have *open*
board meetings!
Which, after all, was Karl's point to
begin with ;-)
Jay.
At 3/8/99, 07:27 PM, Esther Dyson wrote:
>No, the conflict of interest policy..... I believe in disclosure to the
>public. Thanks for yours! Hope others will follow suit. (Check my Website
>for all of mine.)
>
>Esther
>
>At 05:18 PM 08/03/99 -0500, Jay Fenello wrote:
>>At 3/8/99, 05:05 PM, Karl Auerbach wrote:
>>>
>>>> By the end of the day, few knew where the board was going, and we left
>>>> the fate of the DNSO in their hands to be decided in their closed
>>>> board meeting scheduled for the next day.
>>>
>>>But, of course, since ICANN is an open and transparent organization, we do
>>>have minutes of the board's debate and how the various board members
>>>voted.
>>>
>>>We do have that, don't we?
>>>
>>>If not, why not?
>>
>>
>>No, not yet :-(
>>
>>We do know that all decisions of the
>>board were unanimous, except for the
>>Reconsideration Policy, where Esther
>>was the lone dissenter.
>>
>>Jay.
>>
>>
>
>
>Esther Dyson Always make new mistakes!
>chairman, EDventure Holdings
>interim chairman, Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & Numbers
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>1 (212) 924-8800
>1 (212) 924-0240 fax
>104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
>New York, NY 10011 USA
>http://www.edventure.com http://www.icann.org
>
>PC Forum: 21 to 24 March 1999, Scottsdale (Phoenix), Arizona
>High-Tech Forum in Europe: 24 to 26 October 1999, Budapest
>Book: "Release 2.0: A design for living in the digital age"
>
