There was a definition of a domain holder floating around. It was anyone
with administrative control of a zone file. (whether they did the actual
editing or not)
David Schutt
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karl Auerbach
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 1999 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Forming a NCDNC
As you know, I find constitutiences to be a very, very bad idea.
But that aside, let's look at your single question: Who gets a vote? In
particular the question of "does a nomain holder get a vote"?
What constitutes a "domain"?
I suspect everybody will say that the holder of xxx.com holds a domain.
But what about the holder of yyy.xxx.com?
Why not? Are subdelegated domain holders inferior citizens?
If so, then we've just ruled out everyone such as joe.com.au.
(Ignore the fact that one might infer that joe might be presumed to be
commercial in the above example. ;-)
--karl--
