As you know, I find constitutiences to be a very, very bad idea.
But that aside, let's look at your single question: Who gets a vote? In
particular the question of "does a nomain holder get a vote"?
What constitutes a "domain"?
I suspect everybody will say that the holder of xxx.com holds a domain.
But what about the holder of yyy.xxx.com?
Why not? Are subdelegated domain holders inferior citizens?
If so, then we've just ruled out everyone such as joe.com.au.
(Ignore the fact that one might infer that joe might be presumed to be
commercial in the above example. ;-)
--karl--
- [IFWP] Forming a NCDNC Jay Fenello
- [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC John B. Reynolds
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC Martin B. Schwimmer
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC David Schutt
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC Roeland M.J. Meyer
- RE: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC John B. Reynolds
- [IFWP] Re: Forming a NCDNC jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Forming a NCDNC Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Forming a NCDNC A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Forming a NCDNC William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Forming a NCDNC Einar Stefferud
- RE: [IFWP] Forming a NCDNC David Schutt
- Re: [IFWP] Forming a NCDNC Einar Stefferud
- RE: [IFWP] Forming a NCDNC Karl Auerbach
- RE: [IFWP] Forming a NCDNC David Schutt
