John B. Reynolds a �crit:
>
> Jay Fenello wrote:
> >
> > Non-commercial domain name holders
> > Iperdome's clients are almost exclusively
> > non-commercial domain name holders.
> >
>
> But Iperdome itself is a commercial entity. On that basis, it is > clearly
>ineligible.
An interesting point, and hard to argue with. For-profit ISPs cannot
reasonably expect to join a constituency of non-commercial entities.
This goes back to the old problem of Einar Stefferud claiming that
ISPs are the representatives of the end-users. It simply isn't so.
OTOH, ISPs that perform non-commercial, non-profit services might
reasonably join the NCDNH constituency, although perhaps not as
representatives of their clients, who ought to represent themselves.
