Whomever you are, and all,
Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> Michael
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Sondow writes:
> > Dr Eberhard W Lisse a =E9crit:
> > >
> > > Actually you may recall that I made the definition in Monterrey of "Write
> > > Permission to a Zone File".
> >
> > That's right. I'd forgotten. Well, you and Stef can fight over who
> > gets the banana, although "write permission" isn't quite good enough
> > because of the TC problem that you discuss below. I argued at first
> > with Stef's definition for the same reason.
>
> Power to whoever controls the Write Permission :-)-O
Won't likely fly without some oversite.
>
>
>
> > > In the RFC 1591 a "Domain Manager" entity is mentioned. That one is the
> > > "Domain Holder" as far as I am concerned.
> >
> > Sounds alright. So shall we rename the constituency "non-commercial
> > domain managers"? Or how about "non-commercial SLD (in gTLDs) and
> > 3rdLD (in gSLDs under ccTLDs) managers"? That would make it the
> > NCSIGATIGSUCM constituency (not to be pronounced as an acronym, for
> > obvious reasons).
>
> What's in a name? Non Commercial Domain Holders is quite fine. It's
> the entity that is the Domain Manager who is the Domain Holder.
True. However suppost that entity that has that Domain is selling
3rd level domains. ccTLD are especially a potential for this. And some
of those 3ld are commercial. Than what "Constituency" do they
belong in?
And the divisiveness continues...
>
>
> >
> > > This however poses just a tiny weeny little problem to many of those
> > > commercial ccTLDs where the TC-Machine hires a body in-country to fill the
> > > AC spot whereafter he is never heard from again.
> >
> > A problem which will grow as the Internet grows and as new TLDs are
> > added.
>
> Nope. Because new TLDs will be commercial. I predict that commercial
> ccTLDs will become less actually.
I don't agree with this prediction.
>
>
> >
> > > We have .CUL.NA where we classify entities which are involved with the
> > > preservation of Namibia's national heritage. (The National Museum which is
> > > actually .GOV.NA falls under .CUL.NA and operates the zone).
> >
> > Careful with .CUL.NA. Cul, in French, means "backside".
>
> So what do I care?
>
> > > We have .ALT.NA for individuals (non-profit).
> >
> > What does ALT. stand for?
>
> If I remember correctly, ALT.DE was sort of an alternative domain for
> individuals and that's the fun in being a Domain Coordinator, I can
> choose what I like :-)-O
>
> > > So, to make a long story short, what I suggest is to define the
> > > constituencies (somehow) *AND* prefix the lot with something to the effect
> > > that if an entity fits into more then one, the most specific one is to be used
> >
> > Oh, no. That's no good. Much too reasonable. What we need is to let
> > everyone join as many constituencies as they like. That way, there
> > will be division and divisiveness, and constant in-fighting and
> > tension over nothing, to the great benefit of those pulling the
> > strings.
>
> Ok, let's appoint the K*nt to chair the drafting committee for the
> constituency definitions :-)-O.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WWWOOOHHHAAAAA! What an
awful thought but devious thought!!!!
>
>
> el
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
