Jim and Richard, If IFWP is now a closed list, and involuntarily purged of certain earlier members, I'll stop posting to it and ask to be de-subscribed myself. As the graf of my msg you quote below suggests, I certainly don't/didn't mean to post exclusively to IFWP even with it as an open list--though I did mean to stay within the bounds of netiquette as I understand it by not cross-posting general discussion to a bunch of lists. I'll certainly post all membership-related stuff to open-rsc. Andy, you run the list, right? Is what Jim says true? ...JZ At 10:09 AM 1/1/99 , you wrote: >On Thu, 31 Dec 1998, Jonathan Zittrain wrote: > >> I'm sure we'll post our round of questions and answers to as many existing >> lists as make sense and whose owners don't mind. Domain-policy, orsc, and >> ifwp, not to mention any list the ICANN membership committee might set up, >> seem right, though I'm not fond of cross-posting generally, and after this >> message will stop doing so--sticking just to IFWP--even as you're posting > >The IFWP list is no longer an open list. When the list was restored >after going down on 11 December, certain people found that they had >been taken off the list and could not resubscribe. Others receive >messages from the list but cannot post to it. Under these circumstances >it is wholly inappropriate to regard the IFWP as a suitable list for >posting information to the Internet community at large or to those >involved with the IFWP. > >I have made a number of attempts to contact the list operators; these >have been ignored. I know that others have done the same. __________________________________________________ To receive the digest version instead, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___END____________________________________________
