> > In other words, one person, one vote. One organization, zero vote.
> Sounds like a reasonable proposal. Onno's is interesting, too. But what's
> the point of just passing around these good alternative proposals amongst
> yourselves (ourselves), when the creation of the SOs is proceeding without
> them? Why not send them to the SOs, where they might do some good?
So far I have yet to see an SO proposal that isn't designed to promote the
interests of its authoring body.
The most extrame case being the only "Protocol SO" proposal which has a
membership structure that is written to admit of exactly one member with
any actual power. (The other "members" are essentially placebos positions
with no ability to do anything substantive.)
So, I don't have much faith in the SO proponents doing anything other than
being special interest groups unless they are prodded to do so with a very
sharp stick.
That stick is ICANN -- it should refuse to accept such proposals.
--karl--
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
