Karl and all,
Karl Auerbach wrote:
> > > In other words, one person, one vote. One organization, zero vote.
>
> > Sounds like a reasonable proposal. Onno's is interesting, too. But what's
> > the point of just passing around these good alternative proposals amongst
> > yourselves (ourselves), when the creation of the SOs is proceeding without
> > them? Why not send them to the SOs, where they might do some good?
>
> So far I have yet to see an SO proposal that isn't designed to promote the
> interests of its authoring body.
>
> The most extrame case being the only "Protocol SO" proposal which has a
> membership structure that is written to admit of exactly one member with
> any actual power. (The other "members" are essentially placebos positions
> with no ability to do anything substantive.)
>
> So, I don't have much faith in the SO proponents doing anything other than
> being special interest groups unless they are prodded to do so with a very
> sharp stick.
>
> That stick is ICANN -- it should refuse to accept such proposals.
Don't hold you breath that the ICANN will reject such proposals
Karl.... :(
>
>
> --karl--
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
