Jonathan Zittrain wrote:
> what do you see as the best online architecture for open
> discussion on contentious issues that doesn't have a small
> minority of the stakeholders de facto dominating the discussion?
My real issue was with the source of all these silly
questions. Your Berkman Center has played a role in
these procedings that in my opinion is ignominious to
the extreme. You were responsible for canceling the
wrap-up meeting, backing Mr. Roberts and the ICANN
proposal, placing half your people as staff members
for ICANN and now continue the bogoid charade that your
group is unbiassed, made up of disinterested observer
and serious academics wishing to help us all dumbass
plebian mo-rons into enlightenment.
Maybe if you come clean, dump ICANN, pull all those
eager beaver Berkman zombies off of Robert's payroll
and join the rest of us you might gain some form of
credibility beyond that HAAAARVARD perigree. If a pure
bred poodle craps on the carpet, pees on the bed, chews
the furniture and then sets to biting us all on the
ass for good luck we don't give a fuck how many awards
that pooch hath. We roll the newspaper and prepare to
do battle to teach that frigging fancy mutt a lesson.
Bob Allisat
Free Community Network _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fcn.net _ http://fcn.net/allisat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
