What this means is that the Board members are unwilling to expose their reasons and
process to public view. Funny I seem to remember having effective decision making done
in open meetings. If it is the publics business then let it be done in public.
At 08:52 AM 1/11/99 -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Dave Farber wrote:
>
>> If there is a reason why this is not appropriate for ICANN but is for the
>> others , I think the ICANN Board owes it to the community to tell us now
>>those reasons in detail.
>
>Their stated objection to this in Boston was that effective decision
>making cannot be done in open board meetings, and if forced to do so, all
>decisions would be made elsewhere and the board meeting would be window
>dressing.
>
>
>/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
>Patrick Greenwell (800) 299-1288 v
> CTO (925) 377-1212 v
> NameSecure (925) 377-1414 f
>Coming to the ISPF-II? The Forum for ISPs by ISPs http://www.ispf.com
>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>To receive the digest version instead, send a
>blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>___END____________________________________________
>
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
