Amadeu and all,
Just to make sure that the record is straight for those that may have
forgotten
the past few days posts dealing with the DNSO.ORG bunch, and few facts
need to be clearly restated here.
1.) The January 22nd meeting that Amadeu and the DNSO.ORG is
holding is being preempted by a CLOSED and SECRET exclusive
Meeting on January 21st.
2.) Comments and proposals that Amandeu is also eluding to here
that were submitted to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list are not all
inclusive as we (INEGroup) and many others are not listed on the
Reference page on the DNSO.ORG web site (www.dnso.org)
Either at reference: http://www.dnso.org/docs/ or at reference
http://www.dnso.org/docs/dnso-proposal-comments.htm. As such
this shows that the claim of the DNSO.ORG's "Outreach Program" is
Is a sham and a false claim.
3.) It should also be known that at no time were or are the DNSO.ORG
bunch, as is documented in their own archives of the [EMAIL PROTECTED],
there been a open, transparent, or accountable process. This has
been highlighted by what has become to be known as the "Musical
Mailing list fiasco" or "DNSO.ORG Mailgate".
These are the three primary problems and false claims that the DNSO.ORG
bunch are about amongst other disinclusionary processes that are also
well documented in their own archives.
Amadeu Abril i Abril wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As thse of you present at Monterrey will remember, at the end
> of the meeting we decided that we had two urgent tasks in front
> of us:
>
> * Completeing the application form
> * Reaching out to those consituencies that were underrepresented
> in our process, as well as to any other relevant organisation,
> with the scope of broadening the socail base of the application
> form finally submitted (this was called the "outreach program").
>
> As you already know, in relation with the application form the
> so-caled Transition Team has published a Timetable, wich includes
> a new draft that will try to incorporate as many relevant elements
> as possible form those having submitted proposals/comments (from
> INTA draft byalws, but also form NSI, ORSC and all those having
> participated in the discussion so far). This without prejudice of
> the post-MTY draft, which expresses our current position and was
> published last December.
>
> As for the "outreach program", there were many thngs to do indeed.
> And not all have been addressed yet. One of them was trying to
> involve more entities from what we could call the "commercial and
> TM related interests". These constituencies were clearly
> underrepresented in our process. Even if we had approached them from
> the very beginning, many of those organisations took what I had called
> the "excentric apporach" (as ooposed to concentric; don'0t know whther
> this makes sense in English): first, they weere discussing these issues
> internally, then with "sister" organisations, then with other "commercial"
> groups.... and only then felt they ready to jump into the public discussion.
>
> But finally they were. Some among us /Theresa Swinehart, Davd Maher,
> Ken Stubbs and myself. Later also Fay Howard) have been invited to a
> series of telconferences to discuss how to articulate the discussion
> and channel their participation. The result is the Washington DC meeting
> on January 22.
>
> In relation to such meeting the Transition Team has asked me to state the
> follwoing:
>
> * The meeting is not a DNSO-process (BCN/MTY or DNSO.org if you prefer)
> meeting in the sense of the Barcelona or Monterrey ones. We consider it
> as part of our so-called "outreach program", and a central part of it
> at that.
>
> * The meeting is organized in fact by a group of organisations (the
> so-called "sponsoring organizations") namely the following:
>
> Commercial Internet Exchange (CIX)
> Council of European National Top level domain Registries (CENTR)
> European ISP Association (EUROISPA)
> International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
> International Trademark Association (INTA)
> Internet Council of Registrars (CORE)
> Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI)
> Policy Oversight Committee (POC)
> World Information Technology and Services Alliance (WITSA)
>
> * In this regard, our current Draft Application Form incorporating the
> Barcelona and Monterrey consensus (known as Draft v7 or Draft 3) will
> be presented at this meeting, as well as the planned new draft ("merged
> draft", to be published next Monday)) in which the drafting team is
> trying to harmonize as many elements as possible from our draft, INTA
> draft bylaws, and all the comments received since v7 wass published
> (see http://www.dnso.org, under "What's New").
>
> Hope to see you all there.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Amadeu, on behalf of the Transition Team
>
> PS: I was aksed to send this msg to the transition team maillist for, at
> least, linguistic correction. Due to the usual time constraints, I have
> not done so. But then all of you are now used to my particular version of
> English, not to speak about my typos.... Oh, adn this also means that I
> risk being "amended" ;-)
>
> PS2: Please forward this to any list you deem appropriate
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
