Maybe I am missing something here Jay? I fail to see how
your post
(See below) dispels the myth that adding new gTLD's to the DNS
in and of itself. I will grant you it is ONE argument
in that direction,
but only ONE argument.
Jay Fenello wrote:
Many have argued that new gTLDs will *de*stabalizeRegards,
the Internet and the entire DNS system. This email
should dispell that myth.If anything, an artificially constrained name space
is creating a huge speculative bubble, on the order
of the great Tulip Mania in Holland in the 1600s.It's time for some new gTLDs!
Jay.
At 1/13/99, 08:00 AM, Chuck Gomes wrote:
>New domain requests (including requests for names that may
>be deleted). Even if you were checking you would not have
>been able to notice a big jump in new domains because the
>system was overloaded and not processing them in a timely
>manner.
>
>Chuck
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 5:56 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: staus check on internic
>
>
>At 02:30 PM 1/12/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>We were being hammered and it resulted in a backlog of up
>to
>>4 days.
>
>Hammered in what way? By whois? By new domain requests?
>Is it
>speculators? I haven't noticed a big jump in the number of
>daily
>new-domains (www.domaingames.com), but then again I haven't
>been watching
>too closely either.
>
>Curious...
>
>David Stein
>
>
>--
>DOMAIN-POLICY administrivia should be sent to
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To unsubscribe send a message with only one line "SIGNOFF
>DOMAIN-POLICY"
>For more help regarding Listserv commands send the one line
>"HELP"
>
>
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
