list  

Messages by Date

• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: A New Paradigm (and a New Person-centered Multi-level Communic. Framework) steve
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: WIPO's done deal? jeff Williams
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: WIPO to the Rescue(NOT!) Patrick Greenwell
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: Voting mechanisms: the Amer. Arbit. Assoc. jeff Williams
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: Voting mechanisms: The Amer. Arbit. Assoc. Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Bret A. Fausett
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Voting mechanisms: The Amer. Arbit. Assoc. Michael Sondow
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] WIPO's done deal? Michael Sondow
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: WIPO to the Rescue(NOT!) Jay Fenello
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: It is likely to be illegal Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? jeff Williams
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Christopher Ambler
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Ron Kimball
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure jeff Williams
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Joop Teernstra
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: Modification of DNSO bylaws: Membership jeff Williams
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: NSI's DNSO Position jeff Williams
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: staus check on internic jeff Williams
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] APRICOT'99 James Seng
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] RE: A New Paradigm (was: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) Ken Stubbs
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] open meetings Dave Farber
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: WIPO to the Rescue(NOT!) Michael Sondow
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Back to the local root.zone discussions. Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] WIPO confident of their plan Christopher Ambler
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Christopher Ambler
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Einar Stefferud
• 1999/01/15 [ifwp] Re: rumor: dnso.org and trademark community have cut a deal Daniel Pare
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: what ICANN is up to: the financial arrangements for paying IANA salaries; why the NIST solicitation for ICANN contracts is illegal and can be stopped with an ORSC protest letter; why its a waste of board member's time to talk to mail lists; conversations with esther dyson and mike roberts and others jeff Williams
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: It is likely to be illegal Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? jeff Williams
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure jeff Williams
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Where is the public interest and Cook's report on IANA-ICANN transfer Ronda Hauben
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: WIPO to the Rescue(NOT!) Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] WIpo to the rescue? to:Re: WIPO to the Rescue(NOT!) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] WIPO to the Rescue(NOT!) Patrick Greenwell
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: Vint Cerf is on Cspan Now! Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: Vint Cerf is on Cspan Now! Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Karl Auerbach
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Vint Cerf is on Cspan Now! Jay Fenello
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Congratulations and thank-you to Harvard Berkman Centre Milton Mueller
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: what ICANN is up to: the financial arrangements for paying IANA salaries; jeff Williams
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] RE: A New Paradigm (was: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) Ellen Rony
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Bret A. Fausett
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: what ICANN is up to [re open Board meetings] ... Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure jeff Williams
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: ICANN's legitimacy jeff Williams
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: what ICANN is up to [re open Board meetings] ... Martin B. Schwimmer
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Martin B. Schwimmer misquoted me Gordon Cook
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: what ICANN is up to [re open Board meetings] ... Tamar Frankel
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: what ICANN is up to [re open Board meetings] ... Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: what ICANN is up to [re open Board meetings] ... Martin B. Schwimmer
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] RE: A New Paradigm (was: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) David Schutt
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: [bwg-n-friends] A New Paradigm (was: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) Jim Dixon
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Ron Kimball
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: what ICANN is up to: the financial arrangements for paying IANA salaries; Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] what ICANN is up to: the financial arrangements for paying IANA salaries; why the NIST solicitation for ICANN contracts is illegal and can be stopped with an ORSC protest letter; why its a waste of board member's time to talk to mail lists; conversations with esther dyson and mike roberts and others Gordon Cook
• 1999/01/14 [ifwp] Re: what ICANN is up to: the financial arrangements for paying IANA salaries; Joop Teernstra
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Joop Teernstra
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: what ICANN is up to: the financial arrangements for paying IANA salaries; why the NIST solicitation for ICANN contracts is illegal and can be stopped with an ORSC protest letter; why its a waste of board member's time to talk to mail lists; conversations with esther dyson and mike roberts and others Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Techo-speak, allowed by M. Sondow? Michael Dillon
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: ICANN's legitimacy Gordon Cook
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: A New Paradigm (was: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] A New Paradigm (was: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) Jay Fenello
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Some Interesting Parallels . . . Jay Fenello
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Power to the People! Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC! Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] RE: Our Thanks and gratitude & Report jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC! Bob Allisat
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last William X. Walsh
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] RE: Our Thanks and gratitude & Report William X. Walsh
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Our Thanks and gratitude & Report jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC! Greg Skinner
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last William X. Walsh
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC! Ray Hallman
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] No More Central Authority: Not NSI/ICAN! Not ORSC! Bob Allisat
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Captain Mike's Sinking Ship Greg Skinner
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] STV Eric Weisberg
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Power to the People! Bob Allisat
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Captain Mike's Sinking Ship Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Captain Mike's Sinking Ship Bob Allisat
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] RE: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure ( was :Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) Ken Stubbs
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Alex Kamantauskas
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Roberto Gaetano
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Roberto Gaetano
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] NSI's DNSO Position cgomes
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Jim Dixon
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Mikki Barry
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Bret A. Fausett
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] RE: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Roberto Gaetano
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time) William X. Walsh
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: to whom to complain re sole source for ICANN from Nist jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Open Board meetings Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: ICANN's legitimacy jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Joop Teernstra
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure ( was :Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure ( was :Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure Joop Teernstra
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Reflections on an attack Joop Teernstra
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: ICANN's legitimacy Jim Dixon
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Open Board meetings Patrick Greenwell
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Jim Dixon
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Michael Sondow
• 1999/01/13 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Karl Auerbach
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Trust Gordon Cook
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure ( was :Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Karl Auerbach
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Michael Sondow
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Objections to a flat structure ( was :Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Karl Auerbach
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Ellen Rony
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: rumor: dnso.org and trademark community have cut a deal jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: rumor: dnso.org and trademark community have cut a deal jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: ICANN's legitimacy jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Open Board meetings Einar Stefferud
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] to whom to complain re sole source for ICANN from Nist Gordon Cook
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: ICANN's legitimacy Gordon Cook
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Objections to a flat structure ( was :Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?) Joop Teernstra
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Eric Weisberg
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: ICANN's legitimacy Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Bret A. Fausett
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] ICANN's legitimacy Greg Skinner
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Internet Blues Band (was Techno-speak) Craig Simon
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: "Usenet is a slow moving parody of itself" - Steve Bellovin Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: rumor: dnso.org and trademark community have cut a deal Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: "Usenet is a slow moving parody of itself" - Steve Bellovin Ben Edelman
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: rumor: dnso.org and trademark community have cut a deal Greg Skinner
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Techo-speak, allowed by M. Sondow? Dan Steinberg
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Dan Steinberg
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Einar Stefferud
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Karl Auerbach
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: rumor: dnso.org and trademark community have cut a deal Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Martin B. Schwimmer
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: rumor: dnso.org and trademark community have cut a deal Greg Skinner
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Patrick Greenwell
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: DNSO worries jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Karl Auerbach
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Alex Kamantauskas
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Patrick Greenwell
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: "Usenet is a slow moving parody of itself" - Steve Bellovin Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Martin B. Schwimmer
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Gordon Cook
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Patrick Greenwell
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Roeland M.J. Meyer
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Alex Kamantauskas
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Ellen Rony
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: "Usenet is a slow moving parody of itself" - Steve Bellovin Greg Skinner
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time) jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Jay Fenello
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: "Usenet is a slow moving parody of itself" - Steve Bellovin Richard J. Sexton
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Alex Kamantauskas
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Washington DC Meeting & DNSO Process jeff Williams
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it? Kent Crispin
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Patrick Greenwell
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: "Usenet is a slow moving parody of itself" - Steve Bellovin Greg Skinner
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Constituencies Patrick Greenwell
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Internet Blues Band (was Techno-speak) Karl Auerbach
• 1999/01/12 [ifwp] Re: Internet Blues Band (was Techno-speak) Alex Kamantauskas

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]