Patrick Greenwell a �crit:
>
> On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Michael Sondow wrote:
>
> > Which is where the January 21 & 22 meetings in Washington come in. That's
> > where support for WIPO's new rules will be fixed, probably on the 21st, with
> > the re-written DNSO proposal, including WIPO's draconian DN constraints
> > (two-month wait between registration and allocation, investigation of the
> > applicant, a requirement to sign an agreement to be bound by a
> > WIPO-appointed arbitration board, etc.) submitted to the community on the
> > 22nd.
>
> Michael, can you point me to this document?
Patrick-
These are actually demands culled from a series of documents: WIPO
proposals, INTA proposals, and others. Unfortunately, I haven't had time to
collate all the documents. (My secretarial chores have fallen behind with
all this posting activity.) But I'll send you individual items as I run
across them, if you'd like.
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
