-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jorge,
No one is denying the necessity for this function to be present, or
for the IRAC to be created. The problem is the methods by which the
members were selected. There was no open review process of potential
candidates. The ICANN Board has given lip service to a process that
could have shown the world that it is serious about knowledgeable,
independent review of ICANN processes.
ICANN is failing at the one most important goal it must have; the
confidence of the Internet community.
Gene Marsh
Diebold Incorporated
- -----Original Message-----
From: Jorge Plano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 1999 9:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Fwd: Re: What the ??? ICANN Appoints Independent
Review Advisory Committee
Perhaps if you read again the Bylaws you can find what is the meaning
of this
Committee.
Jorge Plano
(quotations follow)
Bylaws of ICANN
http://www.icann.org/bylaws-pr23nov98.html
ARTICLE III: TRANSPARENCY AND PROCEDURES
Section 4. RECONSIDERATION AND REVIEW
(b) The Initial Board shall, following solicitation of input from the
Advisory Committee on Independent Review and other interested parties
and
consideration of all such suggestions, adopt policies and procedures
for
independent third-party review of Board actions alleged by an
affected
party to have violated the Corporation's articles of incorporation or
bylaws.
ARTICLE VII: COMMITTEES
Section 3. ADVISORY COMMITTEES
(d) Until such time as the Board adopts procedures for independent
review
as contemplated by Article III, Section 4, there shall be an Advisory
Committee on Independent Review. The members of the Advisory
Committee on
Independent Review shall consist of certain Directors selected by the
Board as well as other persons appointed by the Board. The chairman of
the
Advisory Committee on Independent Review shall be appointed by the
Board
and shall be a Director. The responsibility of the Advisory Committee
on
Independent Review shall be to advise the Board on the creation of
the
independent review process called for in Section 4 of Article III.
>From: Ronda Hauben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ICANN continues to carry out the creation of an organizational
> form that has no respect for the principles that have guided the
> development of the Internet
>
> Most recently, is the creation of a Review committee that is
supposedly
> to oversee ICANN that has been created with no more understanding of
the
> importance and nature of the human-computer networking-human
> communication that the Internet facilitates than ICANN itself or
any of
> the other entities it is developing.
>
>
> Bill Lovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>I also have to question how an ICANN director can be part of the
> >>Review Committee.
> >
> >
____________________________________________________________________
Get free e-mail and a permanent address at
http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2
iQA/AwUBNwzBBpHtPfG6xLnPEQI4IwCgjTyrsZ6NZGzh5cyV60h6QQ2k1BQAn2at
4YMSA4NOjz82NN+jo8XRMBLS
=fptn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
