Christopher is exactly correct here, and it has been made plainly
evident
to Kent on several occasions as Christopher and others have made
plainly clear on too many occasions in the past. But more importantly
it is exactly this sort of mentality or thinking (Pick your own term)
that
has plagued so much of these discussions/debates. What is odd
to me anyway, is that the ICANN Interim Board seems to be leaning
in this very same direction. Could their be some collusion here?
Christopher Ambler wrote:
Kent argues against himself.Regards,Kent states that IOD's claim on .web is moot, since its US trademark
is irrelevant if someone trademarks it in Germany.However, if someone in Germany trademarks .info (one of the CORE
TLDs), .info is in the same boat. Yet Kent claims that they could be
implemented immediately.You can't have it both ways.
What if someone in Germany trademarks .com? What if Sun claims
.com, (as in "we're the dot in dot com")?In whole, Kent's argument is just so much hot air. Again.
--
Christopher Ambler
This email address belongs to a Resident of the State of Washington
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
