Mr Madison, I presume?
But why should the business or organizational model be rational, or
rationally reductive to the modern-day equivalent of the preservation of
Virginian property rights?
Few of the existing international organizations function in that manner, if
they did they would be easily replaced with simple networking devices.
Is it not the case that the adaptive psychotics (a terms of praise) do best
in these areas where there are no models, not the rationalists unable to
initiate or lead?
Your understanding is repelled by these discontinuities, a Jeff will thrive,
seeing nothing other than a pattern of opportunity for self-appraisal through
the eyes of others.
MM
"Bret A. Fausett" wrote:
> http://www.theonion.com/onion3514/unfit_to_govern.html
>
> The article above, entitled "American People Ruled Unfit to Govern," is a
> comic report of a supposed U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the
> people of the United States were ruled too incompetent to represent
> themselves and had the right to vote taken away.
>
> I laughed until I saw how close it comes to reflecting some of the
> constituency proposals that will be presented to ICANN in Berlin. Owners
> of intellectual property who are not entitled to meaningfully participate
> in the IP constituency? Organizations suggesting that they alone
> represent the collective voice of the IP world? If I weren't seeing these
> things develop, I'd think I had just read another piece on the Onion.
>
> -- Bret
--
_______________________________________________________________________
Josmarian SA [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UK tel/fax: 0044.1273.474894 CH tel/fax: 0041.22.363.8800/1 FR tel/fax:
0033.450.20.94.92
"Reality is an agreement between partners, preferably consensual, usually
painful."
Koskas Josmarian: unpublished letter, 1932
______________________________________________________________________
