Cato Inst wrote,
>       ICANN was created to administer basic rules for the Internet such as those
> determining how domain names are distributed. 

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers 
(ICANN) is a new, private, non-profit, international corporation 
formed by the global Internet community to assume responsibility 
for managing Internet  **technical coordinating functions** including 
domain-name system (DNS)  anagement, IP address block 
allocation, the coordination of the assignment of technical protocol 
parameters, and root server system management.

ICANN was created in response to the , "Management of Internet 
Names and Addresses," a U.S. Government "White Paper" issued 
in June 1998, that invited the global Internet community to form a 
new, private sector organization to undertake management of 
Internet domain-name system functions. 

The fact that so far it is the only corporation to respond does not 
give ICANN any kind of mandate to determine how domain names 
are "distributed." In the context of registrar accreditation, the 
proposal to include compulsory arbitration is bad enough "mission 
creep"; that "guidelines" of what constitutes permissible names  
are being enunciated by an "appointed interim board" (one would 
call it a junta in cartain other administrative circles) rather than by 
any representation of  Internet users suggests that more than one 
democratic principle is being -- has already been -- overrun. Like 
Clinton bombing Belgrade without even intending to ask Congress 
to declare war, now its money versus the common people (hmmm, 
not so different, at that!)

Btw, the simple *technical* solution to all this is to discontinue the 
DNS -- a relic, after all, from the days when people actually relied 
on their own memories to "enter" an IP address, and on spiral 
notebooks to track who maintained which system.  Cut-and-paste, 
drag-and-drop make such aides-memoire utterly irrelevant. (One 
might surmise that  they are doomed even as advertising, as 
reading itself becomes progressively obsolete.)  ICANN has 
absolutely no business in this arena, whatsoever -- and I wont be 
surprised if it soon finds itself without any business at all.  "The Net 
perceives censorship as damage, and routes around it."

kerry

Reply via email to