Ken Stubbs a �crit:
> in this case i only reply when someone appears to be going "over the > edge "
I make it a point to go beyond the bounds of conventional reality.
It's the only way to approach an understanding of a situation
determined by your colleagues in ISOC/CORE/INTA, who act in a way so
far "over the edge" that no conventional analysis can begin to
explain what they're up to. From what I've witnessed of their
methods, no ascription of evil motive or illicit conspiration to
their doings, no matter how far "over the edge" it appears, can pass
or even approximate the reality. So, while you may fool others with
your calls to a return to conventional analysis, you are wasting
your breath with me. I will not return to the fold of those you are
tricking.
