Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report

[Patrick Greenwell]

On Thu, 13 May 1999, Kent Crispin wrote:

> >  That is what will be required if the famous
> > marks exclusion becomes part of your so desirable unform base DRP.
> 
> Not at all.  It is absolutely and completely trivial to implement
> this at the registry level -- for example, the registry simply
> registers the names to an escrow entity. 
> 
> Furthermore, if the famous mark exclusion doesn't work out, it will
> be dropped.  It isn't necessary that the policy be perfect to start
> with -- it just matters that there be a policy, and that it be
> modifiable with changing conditions. 

Legislators know how to put laws on the books. They have little experience
in taking them off.

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell                Telocity           http://www.telocity.com
                                  (tinc)
Coming to the ISPF?     The Forum for ISPs by ISPs  http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/