In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kent Crispin writes:
> On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 09:31:21AM -0500, Eric Weisberg wrote:
> > Izumi AIZU wrote:
> >
> > > But I want to state that the geographic diversity has been very much
> > > the consensus from last year's IFWP process,
> >
> > Only in an "aspirational" sense. We have never agreed that this form of
> > diversity should be imposed if it will frustrate other forms, as is the case
> > with the current proposal.
> I'm sorry, Eric. You are misinformed. Izumi is correct: geographic
> diversity has been an absolute requirement from very early on, and
> is a component of the White paper. We spent a great deal of time in
> the DNSO meetings discussing exactly this issue.
Crapola! Even if you took the notes yourself, dyslexic and
editorialising as you were, that you can't find there.
Go do a backup or something.
el
