> .... The institutions, regulations, taxes, licensing, and claims
> being advanced by ICANN and its GAC are broad and far reaching. They
> are what threaten the Internet, not NSI.
I quite agree that the ICANN issues are very serious.
However, NSI's continued hegemony over the core parts of the DNS is also a
threat to the the net.
As I've said, I don't fault NSI's instincts and actions in taking
advantage of weak government oversight.
But that doesn't mean that I find that NSI's role is in any way beneficial
to the net. Indeed, I find it destructive insofar as it has discouraged
others to try to create improved mechanisms for DNS administration.
--karl--
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Kim Hubbard
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Kim Hubbard
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] use of domain name, ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Policy proposal (was: 4th WIPO Panel of Expert... Jeff Williams
