Diane and all,
ROFLMAO, I here ya Diane! I sort of prefer the suggestively disgusting
sort of humor myself. I wonder if there is a market for that sort of
"Plug-in"?? Hummmm??? >;)
Diane Cabell wrote:
> Kerry Miller wrote:
>
> > Diane,
> >
> > > > Now there's an interesting phrase! Does anyone (Diane?) have
> > > > an exegesis?
> > >
> > > On routine business conducted by the full (elected) Board, a
> > > simple majority of those present (given a quorum) is required to
> > > act. The passage quoted above (VI.2.e) is intended to remove the
> > > interested SO from voting on its own proposal, thereby requiring a
> > > higher level of support from the remainder of the Board (including
> > > the at-large) to approve it.
> >
> > Yes, I understand the conflict-of-interest aspect as regards the SO-
> > selectee's *votes. Its the specification that the members
> > themselves are to be ignored that tickled me -- arguably, they
> > couldnt even speak to the proposal.
>
> I've *got* to get a humor plug-in.
>
> Diane Cabell
> http://www.mama-tech.com
> Fausett, Gaeta & Lund, LLP
> Boston, MA
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
