Kerry Miller wrote:
> Diane,
>
> > > Now there's an interesting phrase! Does anyone (Diane?) have
> > > an exegesis?
> >
> > On routine business conducted by the full (elected) Board, a
> > simple majority of those present (given a quorum) is required to
> > act. The passage quoted above (VI.2.e) is intended to remove the
> > interested SO from voting on its own proposal, thereby requiring a
> > higher level of support from the remainder of the Board (including
> > the at-large) to approve it.
>
> Yes, I understand the conflict-of-interest aspect as regards the SO-
> selectee's *votes. Its the specification that the members
> themselves are to be ignored that tickled me -- arguably, they
> couldnt even speak to the proposal.
I've *got* to get a humor plug-in.
Diane Cabell
http://www.mama-tech.com
Fausett, Gaeta & Lund, LLP
Boston, MA
