Yes.
Much like if the members of the gTLD constituency, being actual and
prospective registries, elect their representatives, and they are not
amenable to the ICANN board, it's just another part of the global
conspiracy.
The bylaws say that constituencies self-form. NSI welcomed
prospective registries with openness, and the ICANN board not
only shut them out, but cut the representation down from 3 to 1.
Then, to add insult to injury, the captured DNSO, in creating a
working group to "study" new TLDs, blatantly blocked participation
in that working group by the very prospective registries it is
meant to address.
I have spoken with a number of people whos "application" for
participation was "accepted" immediately. Mine was rejected.
Who's doing the "accepting?"
Wake up, people, the DNSO is rigged.
--
Personal Opinion Only, of course...
This email address belongs to a resident of the State of Washington,
who does not accept unsolicited commercial email.
> So I guess the point here is that, if the members of a constituency -- in
> this case everyone who has applied for and received actual or provisional
> accreditation, which was open to everyone in the world -- elect their
> representatives, and they are not amenable to Sondow, it's just another
> part of the global conspiracy?
