Richard Sexton wrote, >>Therefore, it was necessary to trust the new board. There are no >>procedural guarantees in fact available. > >How many people here trust the board ? > More than I trust POC; more than I trust NSI; more than I trust the Names Council; more than I trust the Commerce Department; more than I trust the U.S. Government Administration; more than I trust the U.S. Congress; more than I trust the GAC. But on the whole, not a great deal. For all his faults, I would rather Jon Postel were running everything, because I did trust him.
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The powers of the board Anonymous
- [IFWP] Before we argue, let's DISCUSS Anonymous
