>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:    Non-member submission from [Jay Hauben 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]   
>Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:57:43 -0400 (EDT)
>
>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Jun 29 11:57:42 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from tam.dorsai.org (tam.dorsai.org [206.127.32.35])
>       by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C95F01B
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:57:41 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from amanda.dorsai.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [206.127.32.130]) by 
>tam.dorsai.org (8.8.4/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA16971; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:56:13 -0400 
>(EDT)
>From: Jay Hauben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: (jay@localhost) by amanda.dorsai.org (8.8.5/8.6.12) id LAA05416; Tue, 29 
>Jun 1999 11:56:12 -0400 (EDT)
>Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:56:12 -0400 (EDT)
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re:[IFWP]Computer science or the "market", gov't or ICANN
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>"Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (quoting Ronda to
>begin with):
>
>>>>>The Internet was not the "market" when it was born and it isn't
>>>>>and won't be a "market now or in the future.
>>>>
>>>>>It is a communication medium.
>>>
>>>So is a newspaper, and by Jesus look at the ads in that thing.
>>>
>>>Is that what you wish as the model for the Internet?
>
>>"I don't wish to offer an opinion about how the net should be run; that's
>>like offering an opinion about how salamanders should grow: nobody has any
>>control over it, regardless of what opinions they might have"  - BKR
>
>The Internet and many other things are not biological systems like
>a salamander is. People of good well and with public interest can and
>should exert what effort they can to help direct the growth and development
>of social institutions like the Internet into socially valuable directions.
>
>--
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."
>
>Jay
>
>
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."

Reply via email to