If there was any doubt about Michael caring more about personal
recognition than about the goals he purports to support, let this
message below put them to rest.
Michael, Patrick said no such thing, and nor is he guilty of any of
the charges you hastily posted below.
On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 13:50:53 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Patrick Greenwell a �crit:
>>
>> Doubtlessly you'll scream at me for not agreeing with your assesment.
>
>I sceram at no one. But are you content, then, that the NC is in the
>hands of CORE (and ISOC)? Is this, according to you, the fulfillment
>of the White Paper's call for self-organization by all stakeholders?
>
>Are you helping here to justify CORE and ISOC's takeover of the DNSO
>because it keeps users like me out, which you seem to be in
>agreement with, since you have insulted and rejected and aggressed
>against us ever since we dared to intervene on these lists and in
>the NewCo, despite the fact that the White Paper and the DOC have
>stated that the DNSO should be divided equally between users and
>operators? I guess that, for you, capture of ICANN by CORE and ISOC,
>so long as it excludes the users, is the lesser of two evils. At
>least, that's what you seem to be saying.
--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
"The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."
--Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
