William and all,
William X. Walsh wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 11:16:25 +0100, Jeff Williams
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >William and all,
> >
> > I certainly don't see your take on Michaels post at all. It appears
> >readily apparent in Michael's post that he was using himself as
> >an EXAMPLE, not for personal gain or recognition of any kind.
> >
> > But as we have all learned that YOU William, have a personal
> >problem with Michael and others, which this post reply to Michael
> >on the list seems to strongly indicate yet again. This of course
> >comes as no surprise, as it seems to be your habit.
>
> I have no personal problem with Michael whatsoever.
Sure, whatever.
>
>
> Whatever would make you think that?
Oh, nothing, nothing at all... (Sarcasm intended)
>
>
> I merely point out observations, which have already proven to be borne
> out by the facts.
Please list those facts with cooberating evidence. If not than they
are not facts, they are just your opinions...
>
>
> Pesky things those facts, aren't they Jeffey? I have some more facts
> that came into my hands today that you may find interesting, once I
> verify them.
Oh sure. You are not a strong purveyor of facts WIlliam. You ARE
however a well known purveyor of false assertions....
>
>
> >William X. Walsh wrote:
> >
> >> If there was any doubt about Michael caring more about personal
> >> recognition than about the goals he purports to support, let this
> >> message below put them to rest.
> >>
> >> Michael, Patrick said no such thing, and nor is he guilty of any of
> >> the charges you hastily posted below.
> >>
> >> On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 13:50:53 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Patrick Greenwell a �crit:
> >> >>
> >> >> Doubtlessly you'll scream at me for not agreeing with your assesment.
> >> >
> >> >I sceram at no one. But are you content, then, that the NC is in the
> >> >hands of CORE (and ISOC)? Is this, according to you, the fulfillment
> >> >of the White Paper's call for self-organization by all stakeholders?
> >> >
> >> >Are you helping here to justify CORE and ISOC's takeover of the DNSO
> >> >because it keeps users like me out, which you seem to be in
> >> >agreement with, since you have insulted and rejected and aggressed
> >> >against us ever since we dared to intervene on these lists and in
> >> >the NewCo, despite the fact that the White Paper and the DOC have
> >> >stated that the DNSO should be divided equally between users and
> >> >operators? I guess that, for you, capture of ICANN by CORE and ISOC,
> >> >so long as it excludes the users, is the lesser of two evils. At
> >> >least, that's what you seem to be saying.
> >>
> >> --
> >> William X. Walsh
> >> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
> >> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
> >>
> >> "The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
> >> characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."
> >> --Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
> >
> >Regards,
>
> --
> William X. Walsh
> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
>
> "The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
> characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."
> --Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
