> >A proposed solution to the "cybersquatting" problem Mr. Crispin raised (one > >person registering tons of generic words and jacking up the price for the > >"real" users). This is the solution that some ccTLDs have used. > > There are laws to deal with this... there are laws to deal with this... > there are laws to deal with this... this is a recording. There are no laws to prevent one person from amassing 200 un-trademarked generic domain names which was the scenario presented in the discussion. The discussion, as I understand it, concerns whether or not there should be. dc
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) P... Richard J. Sexton
- [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) Prote... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) P... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) P... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) P... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Tradema... sthaug
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Tra... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) P... Gene Marsh
