>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Admin request of type /\bchange\b.*\baddress\b/ at line 6
>Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
>
>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 8 12:49:27 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from fw2.iaea.org (fortress.iaea.org [195.212.98.66])
> by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF696F01F
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:49:26 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from sp1t2n03.iaea.or.at. (ns1.iaea.or.at [161.5.64.79])
> by fw2.iaea.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA19979
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 18:43:17 +0200 (METDST)
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from iaea-m1.iaea.org (iaea-m1.iaea.or.at [161.5.68.240]) by
>sp1t2n03.iaea.or.at. (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.7) with ESMTP id SAA57912; Thu, 8 Jul 1999
>18:39:55 +0200
>Received: by iaea-m1.iaea.or.at with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
> id <N32S3ZG4>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 18:42:56 +0200
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: IFWP list and Internet Governance
>Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 18:41:29 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>Hi, IFWPers.
>
>This mail will bounce, as I am unable to get the subscription to the IFWP
>list with my new address.
>
>I first asked Richard Sexton to change my address, and he referred me to
>instructions at the Web site http://www.open-rsc.org/ - please note that to
>address a mail to Richard is already a non-straightforward task for the 99%
>"minority" who refers to the root system as authoritative ;>)
>
>I followed instructions at the site (http://www.open-rsc.org/lists/others/),
>and asked people at my former site to unsubscribe my old address, while I
>subscribed my new one.
>
>In fact, after a couple of days ("Gee, isn't the list silent!"), I realized
>that the thing did not work. The postmaster at ETSI told me that my mailbox,
>that is still active for administrative reasons, is flooded with IFWP
>messages, while I did not get any.
>So, we did everything once again. But, surprise!, the system did not do it,
>because it claimed it was already done.
>
>So, last resort, the E-Mail address on the Web site for "problems &
>suggestions", [EMAIL PROTECTED] In fact, it is Andy Sernowitz' E-mail,
>and he kindly answered that he is not managing this since a year ago.
>
>I think that this, while it is just a minor incident (maybe in my getting
>settled in the new job, city and country I would not have had time anyhow to
>go through my mail), it is interesting in relationship with the proposal
>that comes in waves about the IFWP list as the voting body of the Internet,
>and/or the candidate "unique" list for all Internet issues, and so on. If we
>cannot change a subscriber's address, can we be trusted in checking voting
>rights of participants?
>
>The cc: to the dnso list has two purposes: first to ask some DNSOer to
>forward this message to the IFWP, and second to acknowledge that the same
>operation on the DNSO lists worked the first time through.
>
>
>Regards
>Roberto
>
>P.S.: Please note that my new address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], effective
>1999-07-01. This is only temporary, because I will move to a personal
>address soon.
>
>
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."
