At 12:46 PM 7/10/99 -0600, you wrote: > > There has never been any formal vote by "we the people" around > the world giving our permission for the public Internet to become > privatised, and there certainly has never been any ballot measure > before the public transferring power to a committee called ICANN. Gimme a break. We never got to vote on bombing Serbs, impeaching Dipshit, or anything else, either. That's how representative government works. And if there were not a world-wide concensus on taking the Internet out of the hands of the USG, I don't know what it would take to make one. What you refer to as being the "public" Internet is and was in fact that which is under control of some government, in this case the USG. In this and like contexts, that's what "public" means. Bill Lovell
- [IFWP] Re: The gTLD constituency Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Re: The gTLD constituency A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: The gTLD constituency Jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consen... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Gordon Cook
- [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus Gene Marsh
- [Special Attention to Jay Fenello and Congress... Bill Lovell
- [Special Attention to Jay Fenello and Congressman Tom ... Jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: [ga] Letter from Mike Roberts re: gTLD Constitue... Jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: [ga] Letter from Mike Roberts re: gTLD Constitue... Bill Lovell
- [IFWP] Re: [ga] Letter from Mike Roberts re: gTLD Constitue... Jeff Williams
